mirrors/dragonfly
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly.git synced 2025-05-10 18:05:44 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 5

fix(server): Fix multi tx cleanup (#723)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Vladislav 2023-01-24 15:33:43 +03:00 • committed by GitHub
parent d660787c6b
commit 2df1c6636c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 45 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

40
src/server/dragonfly_test.cc
View file

@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ const char kKey2[] = "b";
const char kKey3[] = "c";
const char kKey4[] = "y";
const char kKeySid0[] = "x";
const char kKeySid1[] = "c";
const char kKeySid2[] = "b";
const char kKey2Sid0[] = "y";
} // namespace
// This test is responsible for server and main service
@ -88,6 +93,15 @@ TEST_F(DflyEngineTest, Sds) {
}
TEST_F(DflyEngineTest, MultiAndEval) {
ShardId sid1 = Shard(kKey1, num_threads_ - 1);
ShardId sid2 = Shard(kKey2, num_threads_ - 1);
ShardId sid3 = Shard(kKey3, num_threads_ - 1);
ShardId sid4 = Shard(kKey4, num_threads_ - 1);
EXPECT_EQ(0, sid1);
EXPECT_EQ(2, sid2);
EXPECT_EQ(1, sid3);
EXPECT_EQ(0, sid4);
RespExpr resp = Run({"multi"});
ASSERT_EQ(resp, "OK");
@ -412,6 +426,32 @@ return {offset, epoch}
EXPECT_THAT(resp.GetVec(), ElementsAre(IntArg(1), "6"));
}
// Scenario: 1. a lua call A schedules itself on shards 0, 1, 2.
// 2. another lua call B schedules itself on shards 1,2 but on shard 1 (or 2) it
// schedules itself before A.
// the order of scheduling: shard 0: A, shard 1: B, A. shard 2: B, A.
// 3. A is executes its first command first, which coincendently runs only on shard 0,
// hence A finishes before B and then it tries to cleanup.
// 4. There was an incorrect cleanup of multi-transactions that breaks for shard 1 (or 2)
// because it assume the A is at front of the queue.
TEST_F(DflyEngineTest, EvalBug713) {
const char* script = "return redis.call('get', KEYS[1])";
// A
auto fb0 = pp_->at(1)->LaunchFiber([&] {
fibers_ext::Yield();
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 50; ++i) {
Run({"eval", script, "3", kKeySid0, kKeySid1, kKeySid2});
}
});
// B
for (unsigned j = 0; j < 50; ++j) {
Run({"eval", script, "2", kKeySid1, kKeySid2});
}
fb0.Join();
}
TEST_F(DflyEngineTest, EvalSha) {
auto resp = Run({"script", "load", "return 5"});
EXPECT_THAT(resp, ArgType(RespExpr::STRING));

10
src/server/transaction.cc
View file

@ -1103,15 +1103,15 @@ void Transaction::UnlockMultiShardCb(const std::vector<KeyList>& sharded_keys, E
// It does not have to be that all shards in multi transaction execute this tx.
// Hence it could stay in the tx queue. We perform the necessary cleanup and remove it from
// there.
// there. The transaction is not guaranteed to be at front.
if (sd.pq_pos != TxQueue::kEnd) {
DVLOG(1) << "unlockmulti: TxPopFront " << DebugId();
DVLOG(1) << "unlockmulti: TxRemove " << DebugId();
TxQueue* txq = shard->txq();
DCHECK(!txq->Empty());
Transaction* trans = absl::get<Transaction*>(txq->Front());
DCHECK(trans == this);
txq->PopFront();
DCHECK_EQ(absl::get<Transaction*>(txq->At(sd.pq_pos)), this);
txq->Remove(sd.pq_pos);
sd.pq_pos = TxQueue::kEnd;
}