The actual usage is case insensitive, so this doesn't actually matter.
But if fills my heart with joy.
The test is case sensitive, but the actual response to `git config
commit.gpgSign` is equivalent to `git config commit.gppsign`
- **PR Description**
This removes generated Config.md entries that are contain the word:
`deprecated` (case insensitive) anywhere in their header comment.
I think adding in deprecated configs into the reference config clutters
it at best, and encourages users to use those configs at worst. They are
still going to be validated by the schema, but this PR removes them from
the generated config.
I also added in the missing `deprecated` yaml tags in our user config in
anticipation of https://github.com/invopop/jsonschema/pull/79 getting
merged.
- **PR Description**
Include empty arrays and maps in the generated Config.md
It's not an ideal solution because there's no indication of what kind of objects
you can add to those maps or arrays, but at least they show up at all (with a
comment containing a link to more information), and that's already an improvement.
It's not an ideal solution because there's no indication of what kind of objects
you can add to those maps or arrays, but at least they show up at all (with a
comment containing a link to more information), and that's already an
improvement.
As discussed in #1984, this PR modifies the code such that the `w`
command always commits without pre-commit hooks. The `skipHookPrefix` is
still considered when starting the commit messaged with the prefix in
the regular commit command using `c`.
Skipping pre-commits also works when switching to the editor and adding
a co author from the the `w` command
Add verify flag
Add and update integration tests
Rename verify to forceSkipHooks
Adapt CommitSkipHooks integration test to actually use a hook
Remove forceSkipHooks param from OnConfirm et al
Simplify tests
- **PR Description**
This PR adds a new bulk action for submodules.
As I often work with a lot of submodules that are hierarchically
structured, the flag "--recursive" saves a lot of work.
- **PR Description**
Since they started releasing .0 versions with 1.21.0, the go version
need to be a full release version specifier and not a go language
version. They relented and added support for defaulting to a .0 release
if none is specified in later 1.23.x releases, but for users with local
1.21 or 1.22 toolchains the lack of a full release specifier breaks
them. And going forwards this is more technically correct anyway.
See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/62278#issuecomment-1693620853
Since they started releasing .0 versions with 1.21.0, the go version
need to be a full release version specifier and not a go language
version. They relented and added support for defaulting to a .0 release
if none is specified in later 1.23.x releases, but for users with local
1.21 or 1.22 toolchains the lack of a full release specifier breaks
them. And going forwards this is more technically correct anyway.
See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/62278#issuecomment-1693620853
Assert the entire lines using Equals instead of Contains. This makes the tests a
bit easier to read, and it makes it much easier to decide how they need to be
changed when we change the layout (like we do in the last commit of this
branch).
It is true that this requires changing all these tests for any future UI
changes, but I think this is a good price to pay; those adaptions are trivial
and can be done without thinking.
I'm pretty sure that the check for the main view was meant to be done with the
commit selected in the commits panel, not with the first file of the commit
files view selected, so it was pressing enter too early. It's pure coincidence
that the test worked.
- **PR Description**
Some people have the need to get at the file content of a file as it was
in an earlier commit. They expect to press `e` in the commit files view
and get the file opened in the state it was in at that commit, somehow.
I explained a few times (e.g. in #3902, #4109, and #4327) that this is
not how `e` should work; so if we want this as a feature, we'd need it
as a separate command. However, it's a bit tricky to implement; if we
check out the selected file to a temp file, it's unclear when to remove
the file again. Alternatively we could use EditAndWait to open the file,
then we would block until the user closes the editor and delete the file
then. This is probably not the best user experience though, e.g. it
wouldn't allow opening two files from an older commit at once.
Instead of finding solutions to all these questions, this PR takes a
simpler route and adds a command to the "Copy to Clipboard" menu that
allows copying the entire content of a file. Users can then open a new,
empty editor buffer and paste it in, this is almost as good as opening a
temp file, but without all the questions. This was suggested in #4327.
- **Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements**
* [x] Cheatsheets are up-to-date (run `go generate ./...`)
* [x] Code has been formatted (see
[here](https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#code-formatting))
* [x] Tests have been added/updated (see
[here](https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/blob/master/pkg/integration/README.md)
for the integration test guide)
* [x] Text is internationalised (see
[here](https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#internationalisation))
* [ ] If a new UserConfig entry was added, make sure it can be
hot-reloaded (see
[here](https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/blob/master/docs/dev/Codebase_Guide.md#using-userconfig))
* [ ] Docs have been updated if necessary
* [x] You've read through your own file changes for silly mistakes etc
This is useful for copying the entire content of the selected file as it was at
the selected commit.
We only add it to the commit files panel; it is not needed in the files panel,
because there you can simply press "e" to edit the file.
- **PR Description**
This allows changing git config values while lazygit is running (e.g. in a
different terminal tab, or even in lazygit's ":" shell prompt), and have them
take effect immediately, while still getting some benefit from caching them
while lazygit is in the foreground.
Addresses #4240.
This allows changing git config values while lazygit is running (e.g. in a
different terminal tab, or even in lazygit's ":" shell prompt), and have them
take effect immediately, while still getting some benefit from caching them
while lazygit is in the foreground.
@jesseduffield:
> Let's revert this PR, given that, as @TimShilov says, the
post-checkout hook will receive a flag stating whether the checkout was
for a file or a branch, meaning it's within the user's power to just
update the hook script to only run on branch checkouts if desired.
Before we changed the commitPrefix config to a list in #4261, we had
this bug where the defaults section in `Config.md` would erroneously
list the default for commitPrefix as
```yml
git:
commitPrefix:
pattern: ""
replace: ""
```
This was not correct, commitPrefix was a pointer, and the default for
that was nil, which is not the same.
Now, some people copied and pasted the entire defaults section into
their config files, setting the commitPrefix to an empty pattern (which
is not the same as not setting it at all). And this caused the branch
name to be filled in to the subject field for every commit; see for
example https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/discussions/3632.
New users copying the defaults section into their config file in the
current version no longer have this problem because now that
commitPrefix is a list, it is no longer included in the defaults
section. However, the migration that we added in #4261 would happily
carry over those empty strings into a list entry, so people migrating
from an older version still have the broken config in their config
files.
To work around the issue, ignore commit prefix settings whose pattern is
an empty string. I can't imagine a valid reason why people would
actually want to set the pattern to an empty string, so I assume this
only comes from the broken defaults problem described above.
I'm not mentioning *why* it's not a good idea, and I'm not sure it's important
to explain this to users. I'll say it here:
- it exposes users to potential bugs like the one described in the previous
commit
- if we decide to change the default of an option to something "better" (like we
did with the "show graph" setting), users don't benefit from what we think is
an improvement for most users
Before we changed the commitPrefix config to a list in #4261, we had this bug
where the defaults section in Config.md would erroneously list the default for
commitPrefix as
git:
commitPrefix:
pattern: ""
replace: ""
This was not correct, commitPrefix was a pointer, and the default for that was
nil, which is not the same.
Now, some people copied and pasted the entire defaults section into their config
files, setting the commitPrefix to an empty pattern (which is not the same as
not setting it at all). And this caused the branch name to be filled in to the
subject field for every commit; see for example
https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/discussions/3632.
New users copying the defaults section into their config file in the current
version no longer have this problem because now that commitPrefix is a list, it
is no longer included in the defaults section. However, the migration that we
added in #4261 would happily carry over those empty strings into a list entry,
so people migrating from an older version still have the broken config in their
config files.
To work around the issue, ignore commit prefix settings whose pattern is an
empty string. I can't imagine a valid reason why people would actually want to
set the pattern to an empty string, so I assume this only comes from the broken
defaults problem described above.
Some operating systems 'open' implementations do not like
when some special characters are unencoded, so they will
double-enconde the branch name, which we already encode.
This particularly matters since branch names with / are common
There's no way to tell cron to run a job on the first Saturday of a
month, so we tell it to run every Saturday, and manually check whether
it's the first week of the month. This is not ideal because we'll get
notifications about failed releases three times a month, but it's better
than nothing for now.
There's no way to tell cron to run a job on the first Saturday of a month, so we
tell it to run every Saturday, and manually check whether it's the first week of
the month. This is not ideal because we'll get notifications about failed
releases three times a month, but it's better than nothing for now.
